Your Appointment Today

to Start Your Family Tomorrow

You are here

Blog

claire.jpg

FertileThoughts is launching a contest!

We want to recognize and reward the most active registered users on our Infertility Forums. From May 1-31, we’re tracking the number of posts for each user. Qualifying posts are new threads or responses to threads, and they must be related to the subject matter of the Infertility Forum on which they are posted. Posts should engaging, informative, supportive and helpful.

FertileThoughts.com reserves the right to remove inappropriate, duplicate or offensive posts and disqualify those that have no value to the message boards.

Prizes

  • Grand Prize: $300
  • Second Place: $200
  • Third Plac: $100

Contest Guidelines

  • You must be a registered user of FertileThoughts.com and a U.S. resident.
  • Contest dates: May 1-31, 2011 (Entries will be closed May 31, 2011, 12 p.m. CST)
  • Post often during the term of the contest on the Infertility discussion forums.
  • The Registered Users with the first, second and third highest numbers of quality posts win.
  • Be creative and have fun.

For complete contest rules, click here.

Quality posts are determined by FertilityAuthority.com staff. See official contest rules for complete information.

claire.jpg

"Nature has got it all wrong: When you are younger, it should be harder to get pregnant, and as you get older it should be easier. When you are so ready, you can't do it to save your life. And when you are 21, you are so not ready, but you are ripe as could be. The eggs should become more developed the older you get, not die slowly from the day you're born. That's one thing God got wrong."

Halle Berry to Jonathan Van Meter
Vogue Magazine
September 2010

claire.jpg

a blog by the editors, June 10, 2010

Kudos to EMD Serono for coming up with an ad campaign that's witty, educational and makes us feel better about dealing with the insane beast, Infertilty. They've launched a series of five webisodes at the centerpiece of a new campaign designed to raise awareness about infertility.

[Read: Nailing Infertility with an Ad]

We loved all five! Take a look at each and let us know if you agree:

While there are many things we like about the episodes (doesn't it feel good to laugh about it?), we particularly appreciate how they make the point that infertility affects both partners in a relationship. It's not just about male factor or female infertility. It affects you both, at your unit's core.

What do you think about the webisodes? Let us know. And, if you like them, pass this around to help us usher the stigma of infertility out the door.

See ya, stigma. You're on a slow road to history.

Laurie Gordon
Executive Editor

claire.jpg

a blog by the editors, May 10, 2010

Throwing fuel on the infertile fire, we know you're always being asked -- point blank -- why you don't have children. Argh!

FertilityAuthority has offered up several suggested responses to this question, but this week in the New York Times' column, "City Room - Answers About Etiquette in New York," the question was posed to Lyudmila Bloch, an international etiquette expert, protocol consultant and author of “The Golden Rules of Etiquette at the Plaza.”

The question was from a couple who'd chosen to live child-free. We thought we'd share Ms. Bloch's response:

Q.

    As a married woman in my mid-30s who has decided not to have children, it always surprises me how often I am asked: “Are you going to have children? Why not?” 
It could be at dinner parties in front of other guests, by acquaintances over lunch, at family gatherings…
Invariably my response is uncomfortable and awkward for either my husband or myself, but I can’t seem to deflect the question without seeming rude.

What would be a proper response, keeping in mind that others are involuntary witnesses to this exchange? Thank you!

— Posted by DW

A.

    Unfortunately, you are not alone. Countless men and women have been confronted in social and business settings with rude and awkward questions about family, children, medical conditions, gender and more. It’s a sad fact that tactless adults in modern society are not aware that certain personal questions can never be asked… “Are you married? Do you have children?” The American etiquette expert Emily Post wrote, “Manners are sensitive awareness of the feelings of others; when you have this awareness, you have good manners!”

    Next time you are confronted with an inappropriate question, simply reply: “Thank you for asking. I’m happily married and I don’t have children by choice!”

Simple. Straightforward. Usable? How do you respond to the dreaded question?

Share your one-liners below. Maybe you'll help your sisters. . . .

Laurie Gordon
Executive Editor

claire.jpg

a blog by the editors, Mar. 8, 2010

Think about it: How desperate do you have to be to set fire to your own house?

Desperate. Last-resort Desperate.

Ralph Brown, it seems, was last-resort desperate to have a baby.

Brown, a volunteer with the fire department in Bennington, Vermont, is accused of setting fire to his own house on two occasions in order to collect insurance money to get his wife infertility treatment. Firefighters were called to his home on Feb. 26, around noon and again on Feb. 27 around 10:30 p.m. While the first fire was quickly brought under control, the second fire lasted longer and did more damage to the home. Brown has pled not guilty to numerous arson charges.

We read this story this morning and were struck by just how sad it is. Again, we were reminded just how inaccessible fertility treatment is to the average American.

Vermont, like most states, does not require insurance coverage for infertility treatment – currently only 15 of 50 states do.

So what's the lesson? Crime never pays. If medical insurance did however, tragedies like the Brown family’s could be avoided.

Laurie Gordon
Executive Editor

claire.jpg

a blog by the editors, Feb. 26, 2010

Yesterday’s edition of the talk show The View focused solely on infertility. The show featured celebrity couple Giuliana and Bill Rancic, who are just getting ready for their first IVF following failed IUI cycles, Dr. Jamie Grifo, a fertility specialist at NYU Fertility Center, and two couples and a recently divorced woman who have infertility.

[Watch the full episode. Watch Giuliana and Bill's segment.]

The ladies of The View also talked about their own experiences with infertility. Barbara Walters adopted her daughter following three miscarriages. Sherri Shepherd had her son via IVF treatment following a failed IUI cycle and Clomid treatment. (She’s 42 and wants to have more children. She asked about freezing her eggs, but Dr. Grifo explained that at her age, she’s not a good candidate.) Elisabeth Hasselbeck had trouble getting pregnant until she realized she had Celiac Disease, and went on a gluten-free diet. She now has three children. Joy Behar had an ectopic pregnancy that almost cost her her life when her fallopian tube burst and caused internal bleeding. She has one daughter.

Some of this episode of The View was great and some of it was just plain awkward. There were a couple of “why don’t you just adopt?” moments. That’s never good. And with all due respect to Barbara Walters, she had a hard time understanding a couple of scenarios.

But my overall take-away? I praise all the women and men who went on the program to talk about a very personal issue. I’m really happy to see an open, honest dialogue about infertility: that male infertility is as prevalent as female infertility; that fertility treatments are expensive, that most infertility treatments aren’t covered by insurance; that infertility can be hard on your marriage; that having babies in your late 30s and into your 40s isn’t easy.

Yes! We need to talk more about the fact that age affects fertility!

I hope women who are trying to conceive, or who hope to one day, are listening.

Jennifer A. Redmond
Editor-In-Chief

claire.jpg

a blog by the editors, Feb. 11, 2010

Ok, I’m positively gushing! The moment we’ve all been waiting for has arrived!

FINALLY, a celebrity has stepped forward to talk honestly and openly about her struggles with infertility. Kudos to Celine Dion.

While, no doubt she’s uber-talented, I’ve never been a big fan. But that’s changed. I watched this clip of Celine on Oprah discussing her numerous IVFs (she’s getting ready for her fifth), her recent miscarriage and her secondary infertility (her son, Rene Charles is eight years old).

Publically. In a BIG way. On Oprah!

I am so impressed by her openness, honesty and willingness to share her struggles. But the thing about the interview that struck me most was her ATTITUDE. She’s very realistic about her journey, yet is upbeat (to say the least!)

THANKS, Celine, for taking the shame out of infertility!

Now, who knows the way to the Celine Dion Fan Club?

Laurie C. Gordon
Managing Editor

claire.jpg

a blog by the editors

I’m always amazed at how quick people are to judge. Truly, when I think about it, I’m shocked. Are we really that afraid of people who have views different than ours? Now, I’m not saying I never judge – I’d be lying -- but I guess because of my line of work, I feel much less apt to say someone’s family building choices are right or wrong, moral or amoral.

A recent article in the New York Times, Building a Baby, With Few Ground Rules, by Stephanie Saul, tells a horror story about a husband and wife who hired a surrogate to build their family (using donor sperm and a donor egg). The woman who acted as surrogate -- a married mother with four children of her own -- gave birth to the couple’s twins. The twins went home with the intended parents as planned. The surrogate later sued for (and won) custody of the twins when it was determined the intended mother was “unfit” because of a history of mental health issues.

The story was enough to scare the bejesus out of you and it generated LOTS of comments (163 as I write) condemning surrogacy and the families who choose it to grow their families. The article pointed out that the area of surrogacy is largely unregulated. It cites three cases where legal battles have ensued over whether intended parents are “fit” to raise the children born via surrogates.

To quote the article, “About 750 babies are born each year in this country through gestational surrogacy, and twice that many surrogacies are attempted.” That’s right, there are 750 babies born via surrogacy each year. We hear about three in this article that go awry. Maybe there are a couple others not yet documented. But the point is that 99% of births involving surrogacy go RIGHT and are positive, life-altering experiences.

While ANYONE using a surrogate should consult an experienced surrogacy lawyer, and while I agree that the parties involved in surrogacy should be subject to agreed-upon guidelines, surrogacy is NOT the Wild West. The vast majority of babies who come into this world via surrogates are loved enormously and raised under circumstances similar to those babies born by their biological parents.

Can you imagine if EVERYONE who wanted to have a child was subjected to mental health and medical analysis before building their families? Who would be deemed fit to have a child? Who has a ghost-less closet? Probably not I.

Our world is not perfect. Parents aren’t perfect. ART isn't perfect. Nor is surrogacy. But by and large it is an amazing, altruistic medical achievement that makes families complete.

The cases of surrogacies that go bad aren’t the norm.
Don’t let the outlier cases scare you . . .

Laurie C. Gordon
Managing Editor

claire.jpg

a blog by the editors

In this month’s column for FertilityAuthority, Attorney Melissa Brisman cites a case regarding the custody and control of frozen embryos post divorce.

In the divorce proceedings of an Ohio couple, the court upheld the provision that the lab at which their embryos were stored would assume all rights and responsibilities to dispose of or donate the embryos. Surely, I thought, I’m reading this wrong. The lab will decide whether to dispose of or donate the embryos? Couples sign contracts and consents regarding embryos created through IVF every day, and many have provisions in the case of divorce. But leaving the embryos with the lab? I checked with Brisman, and she says it’s rare that a couple would make this decision.

Couples and individuals spend time, money, and emotional and physical energy to create embryos. If they’ve used their own gametes (eggs and sperm) the embryos have their DNA. Naturally, many couples have a hard time determining what to do with excess embryos. (Excess embryos are such because the couple who created them have had children, or have exhausted their resources, or treatment is no longer an option.) So they choose to store their embryos indefinitely, or donate them to research, donate them to another couple, or thaw and discard them. Some opt to transfer embryos at a time in their cycle when they won’t implant. It’s a tough decision, no doubt.

I don’t have embryos in storage, so I can’t say from experience what I would do. But my hunch is that I’d want to be the decision-maker if they were my embryos, just to have some closure. What do you think?

Jennifer A. Redmond
Editor-In-Chief

claire.jpg

a blog by the editors

We were abuzz this weekend when we read the front page article "The Gift of Life and Its Price" in the New York Times (and its companion piece "Grievous Choice on Risky Path to Parenthood"). After all, our goal here at FertilityAuthority is to educate women about fertility issues and to encourage discussion about the disease of infertility in the hopes of destigmatizing it.

Well, the Times article did just that. Oh boy, did it ever.

From an educational perspective, I found the article excellent. My colleagues, however, (one of whom has twins from IVF and the other who has TRIPLETS), said they thought it was a bit "alarmist.” A difference of opinion and perspective; both valid viewpoints.

I’ve spent about 45 minutes reading the article's commentary and I’m quite taken back. While I didn’t tally arguments for and against multiple embryo transfer (there are more than 300 posts), the bulk of commentary seems to imply (no, it outright states) that women/couples who spent thousands of dollars to “create” a baby via IVF are a self-absorbed, narcissistic lot who should forego IVF altogether in favor of adoption. I'd like to ask these posters if they have children of their own and, if so, if they'd be willing to give up their kids. I doubt they would.

But morals of IVF aside, the Times piece sheds light on many interesting issues. On one hand it clearly implies that single embryo transfer is the best policy for individual couples as well as for society at large, but on the other, it shows that transferring two embryos is more likely to result in a baby than transferring a single embryo.

The most important take away for me? It all comes down to patient EDUCATION.

I talk to many doctors about this issue. Most seem to agree that patient education falls short; that there is simply not enough time to do it justice. But the bottom line is that doctors should spend more time EDUCATING their patients, not just TREATING them.

It’s a challenge, no doubt. Maybe the answer is to have a specialist other than the doctor herself who is responsible for fully educating the patient about the single vs. multiple embryo transfer choice. (After all, my husband and I spent a full hour with a genetic specialist before I had an amnio). Though I’m not sure you can ever make prospective parents understand the potential costs – both subjective and objective – of multiples, at a minimum, you owe it to them to at least spend some time (more than a cursory 5 minutes) reviewing the statistics and potential outcomes.

We’re guessing more patients would choose single embryo transfer if they truly understood the risks and outcomes.

Let’s keep the discussion flowing. It will result in progress.

Laurie Gordon
Executive Editor

Pages